image

by Sofia Brontvein

Who Decided Sports Watches Were For Men?

There is something slightly absurd about the idea that a watch can be masculine or feminine. A chronograph doesn't know who is wearing it. Its pushers don't care about gender, its movement doesn't perform differently on a smaller wrist, and its ability to measure elapsed time has absolutely nothing to do with the clothes surrounding it. Yet watchmaking has spent decades dividing its creations into two familiar categories: substantial, technically complicated watches for men, and smaller, often decorative pieces for women.

The distinction becomes particularly interesting when we look at the history of sports watches. Many of today's most recognisable designs were originally developed as practical instruments. Their proportions, markings and complications were dictated by specific activities, from diving to aviation and motorsport. They weren't necessarily intended to be fashionable. They were designed to do a job.

image
image
image

Before the chronograph became a fashion statement

To understand why racing watches look the way they do, we need to go back to a time when measuring speed was considerably more complicated than checking a digital dashboard.

A chronograph is essentially a watch with a stopwatch function. It allows the wearer to measure elapsed time independently of the regular time display. In motorsport, where fractions of a second can determine the outcome of a race, that capability was once particularly valuable.

Swiss watchmaker Heuer was developing timing instruments for automobiles and aircraft as early as 1911, when it introduced the Time of Trip dashboard timer. Five years later, its Mikrograph stopwatch could measure intervals to one hundredth of a second.

These instruments belonged to a world in which mechanical precision was essential to understanding performance. Before modern electronic timing systems became standard, the chronograph was part of the practical equipment surrounding competitive sport.

One of the most enduring expressions of that relationship arrived in 1963, when Jack Heuer introduced the Carrera chronograph.

Its name came from the Carrera Panamericana, the notoriously demanding Mexican road race. The watch itself was conceived with professional racing drivers in mind. Its defining characteristic wasn't decorative complexity but legibility: a clean dial, carefully arranged markers and information that could be understood quickly.

The principle was simple. When you are travelling at speed, you don't want to spend unnecessary time trying to read your watch.

image

When function becomes fashion

Something interesting happens when an object outlives the original circumstances of its creation. Features that once existed for practical reasons become recognisable design signatures.

Consider the tachymeter scale, traditionally found around the dial or bezel of many racing chronographs. Used together with the stopwatch function, it allows the wearer to calculate an average speed over a known distance. Today, most people wearing a chronograph with a tachymeter are unlikely to use it to measure their speed.

And yet the scale remains. So do the contrasting subdials, prominent pushers and instrument-inspired details.

They have become part of the visual language of sports watchmaking, even when the watch is worn nowhere near a racetrack.

The latest TAG Heuer Carrera Chronograph Sport illustrates this evolution. Introduced in 2026, the collection retains its racing references while revisiting the proportions of the previous generation. The case has been reduced from 44mm to 42mm, its profile is slimmer, and the redesigned bracelet offers a more refined fit.

There are five versions, including blue, green, black and silver dial variations, with one blue model offered on a perforated brown leather strap. Inside is the automatic TH20-00 movement, with an 80-hour power reserve.

The technical heritage remains, but the context in which the watch might be worn has expanded considerably.

image
image
image

The problem with calling a watch masculine

A 42mm steel chronograph is still a substantial object. On a smaller wrist, its presence is impossible to ignore. But perhaps that is precisely the point.

Fashion has long borrowed from traditionally masculine wardrobes. Oversized tailoring, leather jackets, military-inspired clothing and substantial footwear have all moved beyond their original associations. Watches are no exception, although the industry has often been slower to abandon gender-specific categories.

A large chronograph can work as a deliberate contrast to a minimal outfit, a structured jacket or an evening look. Instead of disappearing into the styling, it becomes the element that defines it.

There is also something appealing about wearing an object whose design was shaped by function rather than by conventional expectations of femininity. A racing chronograph wasn't created to be delicate, and it doesn't need to become delicate to look interesting on a woman's wrist.

Of course, size still matters in practical terms. Case diameter is only part of the equation; thickness, lug-to-lug length and bracelet construction all affect how a watch wears. A substantial watch can be comfortable, just as a smaller one can fit poorly.

But comfort is an individual question. Gender is a rather unreliable shortcut.

image

The freedom to wear what you like

As Formula 1 returns to Qatar and Abu Dhabi, the relationship between motorsport and watchmaking becomes particularly visible. The technical language of racing continues to influence contemporary watch design, even as the people wearing those watches have increasingly little in common with the professional drivers for whom some of them were originally conceived.

Perhaps that is what makes these objects interesting. A design created for one purpose can acquire an entirely different cultural meaning without losing its history.

The Carrera began as an instrument built around clarity and precision. More than six decades later, those same qualities can be appreciated as elements of personal style.

And perhaps the most contemporary thing about a traditional racing chronograph isn't its movement, its dial or its connection to Formula 1. It is the possibility of wearing it without feeling obliged to follow the rules someone else invented.